Court dismisses the Imo government’s appeal against the seizure of Okorocha’s properties.

Spread the love
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

 2 total views


A Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal filed by the Attorney General of Imo State and forty others challenging the ruling of an Owerri Federal High Court that granted Senator Rochas Okorocha leave to amend processes filed before the Court.

 

On March 17, a three-judge panel led by Justice Dattijo Yahaya dismissed the appeal following a notice of discontinuance filed on March 16 by the Attorney General of Imo State, Cyprain Akaolisa, on behalf of the appellants.

 

Oba Maduabuchi, Okorocha’s counsel, challenged the withdrawal, alleging that the appellants want to deceive the Court by pretending to withdraw the appeal and then returning to humiliate the former Governor.

 

However, after Maduabuchi argued that the appellants intend to demolish Okorocha’s and his associates’ properties while the suit before a Federal High Court in Owerri and the appeal before the Court of Appeal are pending, Justice Yahaya stated that they have the right to withdraw an appeal following a notice of discontinuance properly filed before the Court.

 

Okorocha’s counsel told reporters after the court decision:

 

 

“The appeal was against the ruling of a lower Court allowing us to amend our processes. Imo State government jumped to the Court of Appeal, saying that it was wrong to allow us to amend our processes.

“They filed their brief; I filed my brief and filed an objection that the appeal is incompetent. Then we filed a motion that every step they have taken, including the arrest and humiliation of Rochas Okorocha during the pendency of this matter must be set aside by the Court of Appeal. We served them with that Motion, they have not filed a counter to it, they went ahead to mark properties belonging to has and his associates for demolition based upon the proceedings of the panels of inquiry that took place during the pendency of both this Appeal and the matter in the lower Court, which is abuse of process of Court.

“Now they have achieved their objective which is to humiliate Rochas, to take over his properties, they have withdrawn the appeal, so what can be more abusive of the process of Court than that.

“When the matter is pending in the Court of Appeal you go and round up proceeding in your panel on enquiry, while the matter is pending in the Court of Appeal you go and forfeit the properties of Rochas Okorocha, you went and Mark his properties for demolition. This is the impunity we have been shouting about, people do things the way they want to do it and not the way the law the law asked them to do it.

“How can you file an appeal you know is incompetent, then while the appeal is pending in the Court of Appeal, you know ask your panels of inquiry to conclude and submit their reports and you issues white paper, seal people’s houses, mark them for demolition while the appeal is pending in the Court of Appeal, that is obviously an abuse of Court process.”


Spread the love
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply